Information
1909 Bleriot
Our 1909 BLERIOT is a frail spindly looking monoplane, which has led a
most adventurous life. The Bleriot in my life has flown the English Channel in both
directions; the Catalina Channel; over the San Francisco-Oakland, Transbay Bridge; in
England, Canada, France, and about half of the states in the United States.
Over the years it has served me in much the same reliable way as our
versatile present-day aircraft, although I am sure it is responsible for giving me more
gray hairs than all the business planes in the alphabet, from Alpha to Zebra.
Louis Bleriot was in many ways as interesting as the airplane.
The son of a successful fabric manufacturer, he became a wealthy man in his own right and
financed his experiments in aviation by the invention of a successful automobile
headlight. Before the advanced design (for its day) that carried Bleriot across the
Channel, there were some eight other largely unsuccessful experimental craft, ranging from
cellular winged gliders to canard aircraft, most of which crashed, burned, or scattered
themselves over the landscape. Until the advent of the 1909 model, Louis Bleriot's
major claim to frame seemed to be his ability to survive any and all accidents.
Bleriot was not only the originator of the monoplane
design that is basic to every business aircraft manufacturer today, but he also originated
streamlining of the fuselage; the engine placed forward, with the single tractor
propeller; the rudder, elevator, and stabilizer placed on the aft part of the fuselage;
and even a partially swiveling landing gear with a capability for crosswinds.
The 1909 Bleriot, along with the rear-elevator Curtiss,
were undoubtedly the two most widely copied aircraft prior to 1914. Literally
hundreds of airplanes were built on farms and in backyards with nothing more to go on than
photographs, the materials often being banana oil, mothers' bed sheets, and slats form the
fence. Because of the popularity of the Bleriot design and its very remarkable
impact on the world (for it received as much publicity in its days as Linbergh's flight
twenty years later), many wealthy sportsmen bought them to use for business and pleasure.
Adventurous barnstomers flew them all over known world, even as far as China and
Tibet!
The basic Bleriot design was light and simple to maintain, as
well as to easy to take apart or set up for flight. From the standpoint of the early
exhibition pilots these were important factors, for the Bleriot could be made ready for
flight in thirty minutes, as against six to eight hours for a Curtiss or Wright.
Another factor was the advent of the 50-hp Gnome Rotary, which gave the Bleriot a
tremendous edge because of its general reliability and low weight per horsepower.
The Bleriot is a wire airplane, and without each wire being properly
attached and safe-tied, it has about the strength of a fifteen cent grocery store
kite. I carefully checked the flying cables, both at the bedsted (front fuselage
frame) and at the wing, as well as the warp cables through the bottom walking beam and the
wing, as well as the warp cables through the bottom walking beam and the wing, and above
on the A frame. Then I checked the fuselage alignment by eye, including the landing
gear sulky wheels and tires, tail surfaces, and control cables. With the aircraft
ready for take-off, the engine idling nicely, and its lone instrument -the oil pressure
gauge-showing fifty pounds, I grasped the spade-type grip and shoved the throttle
forward. The tail was up in about 20 feet; the wind was steady twelve knots;
temperature, 79 degrees; field elevation, 54 feet. I was airborne in about 170 feet.

The graceful, mahogany scimitar-shaped prop, and just
above the "A" frames and wing wires.
As I broke ground, a particularly nasty gust of wind
dropped a wing, and for several seconds, full opposite stick rudder, and elevator were
necessary to pick it up. I had forgotten what a job it was to always maintain the
wings in a level attitude and the necessity of making only very flat skidding turns,
mostly with rudder. In spite of a slow actual ground speed (about 44 to 48 mph),
their is still no experience in my years of flying to equal the sick feeling you have when
a wing goes down in gusty air and you head for the ground unable to pick up the wing in
spite of full opposite control. A good deal of forward pressure is also required on
the stick, for the Bleriots I have flown are all tail-heavy, and if one flies for more
than ten minutes at a time, he has to keep shifting tired arms.
Flying with the camera ship required some prethought,
for if the slipstream ever hit the Bleriot, it could go over on its back-which it did once
with me. At the time I could only think of Adolph Pegoud, the Frenchman who made
the world's first loop in a Bleriot, and wonder why he didn't suffer a coronary, for I am
sure my heart missed a sizable number of beats.

A flight in the rough air around the San
Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
After we finished taking the aerial photographs, I
checked the Bleriot on stalls, which are deceptive, since it pays off with absolutely no
warning, dropping a wing and forcing one to turn into the dropped wing to pick it
up, the stall appears to be at about 25 to 27 mph. Beyond gentle turns, one is quite
content to just fly along at about 40-odd mph and enjoy the air conditioned ride.
There is no windshield for protection from the direct prop blast.
Landing can be either power on or power off. My
choice is power off, with an extremely steep approach of about 30 percent nose down.
One has only a very short flare-out, because there is no float with the inborn drag of a
Bleriot. It lands smoothly and rolls to a stop on grass in about fifty feet.
One must be very careful to land directly into the wind and pray for no sudden gusty
crosswinds; the latter happened to me once; and one of the very weak main wheels collapsed
under the side load. As the Bleriot ground to a stop, the windward wing rose into
the air. I jumped out of the cockpit and grabbed the flying wires and promptly rose
into the air with the wing. Only the additional weight of a startled airport
attendant hanging on my feet brought both the Bleriot and me back to the ground again.
Louis Bleriot, with a typical French statement, once
said before his famous Channel flight, "If I cannot walk, I'll show the world I can
fly." But this pilot is not sure if he had to fly a Bleriot very often, he
might prefer to walk!
Flying The Bleriot by:
Roger Freeman |
|
"It is hard to put into words readily explainable to the modern
day pilot how perfectly awful it really is to fly the Bleriot and what a great admiration
I have for the pilots whose raw courage often outstripped their piloting skills and
knowledge." |
Frank Tallman |
|
When I first read this description of flying
the Bleriot in Frank Tallman's book "Flying the Old Planes" I was sure that
Frank was flexing his great showmanship. No way would my Bleriot be anything like that. It
was built very carefully and exactly to the plans; it had a more powerful engine so that
should make it better, I thought. What a surprise I was in for!
In my dream of starting a museum of early aviation, it had always
been under- stood that we would need to have certain air planes that represented that
wonder era of the real pioneers. I determined therefore that I would need, at the very
least, a Curtiss Pusher, and of course a Bleriot. We have all read about the great feats
of "Those magnificent men and their flying machines" and marveled at their
flashy showmanship and poise. Surely they were no better pilots than I? I have thousands
of hours of flight time, and a lot of good train- ing. This can't be that bad! Can it?
In 1995 1 decided it was time to begin putting my dreams into
action. I had been running Vintage Aviation Services for some time and had completed a few
good replicas, but I wanted to get my collection growing; to start gathering the aircraft
needed for my dream museum. As I was pretty well swamped with the work that I already had
in the shop, I made a deal with my good friend and fellow builder Julius Junge to start on
a Bleriot project for us. We researched until we found a good set of plans on this type
and discussed what modifications we might need to make on the machine. I located a
suitable power plant and started lining up material. We were on the way to having our
first true pioneer aeroplane.
Julius, working in his shop at Cannon Field, diligently started
making all of the pieces. We decided to go with the 1909 channel-crossing configuration
except for the elevator. Frank Tallman had once told me that the later style was much
better. The rest of the aircraft would be as close as possible to the original. Slowly,
the wood shavings started piling up as Julius crafted all the parts and pieces, and an
aeroplane began to appear from a stack of lumber. In all, Julius spent about a year
building the Bleriot, and on July 28, 1997 1 picked up the completed airframe minus the
engine and covering.
Fortunately (or unfortunately) a new project moved into my
business shop and slowed down the progress on the Bleriot. It was a replica of the 1910
Farman Boxkite, which I thought was a fitting hangar mate to the Bleriot. Since we were
under such a time constraint on the Farman, the Bleriot had to take a back seat. It was so
interesting having two examples of pioneer aeroplanes in the shop at one time. I often
wondered how the two designers took such a different approach at accomplishing the same
goal. I could not help but wonder what it was going to be like to fly each of them. I
would soon find out!
The Farman rolled out of the shop on Aug. 6 1997 ready to make
its first test hops. Contrary to popular belief, you do not just jump into one of these
old crates and head off into the wild blue yonder on the first attempt. You start by taxi
test. First slow and then a little faster. How is it going to handle on the ground? This
is very important to know before you fly it. Next comes the first hop. How is It going to
feel flying, and landing? After a long series of short runs you finally work up to the big
one, when you take it around the field. Once you leave the safety of the runway you are
truly on your own. One way or another you have got to land hopefully in one piece.
The Farman was quite a surprise to me. After a few minor scares I realized that this
really wasn't too bad. After a number of flights I was getting my nerve up to the point of
giving flying demonstrations. About this time I was beginning to believe that I really was
right, and there wasn't much to these old birds.
With the Farman finally delivered to its new home in Hong Kong,
it was time to get back to the Bleriot. I was able to make all of the mounts for the
Continental GPU engine, and have a beautiful prop carved by my friend Ted Hendrickson. We
finally completed the cover job, and we were rapidly running out of excuses not to fly.
Once again we began the taxi phase and it did not take long to see that this was not going
to be as easy as the Farman. It took a lot of power to get the Bleriot start- ed, and once
moving, it accelerated much faster. The rudder, which is very small, did not take effect
until the speed rose, so ground con- trol was going to be tricky. I started slow and began
speeding up a little at a time. Suddenly, just as I was completing what I thought was a
very successful high-speed taxi, things started going awry. As I pulled the power off to
decelerate, I began to turn. The rudder did not have any effect since it did not have the
blast of the propeller. I was now caught in the midst of a fullfledged ground loop, and I
was just a passenger! Before we finally came to a full stop, the right wing began to rise,
then I was drag- ging the left. On the Bleriot this seems pretty drastic since the wing
tips are quite a way off of the ground. There I was, at complete stop with the left wing
on the ground and the right sticking way up in the air. The engine was still ticking
along, and gradually the plane fell back onto its gear. (This was not supposed to happen.)
After much head scratching, I decided that the tailskid was to
blame since it did not necessary
always go back to center after banging on the ground. A few more taxi tests revealed that
although my repair did seem to help, it did not solve the problem. Getting started was not
the problem; it was slowing down that ate my lunch! Next I went after the landing gear.
The Bleriot has a very ingenious trailing link landing gear that also swivels with any
side load. On one of the next high speed taxi tests, I was slowing down and wham I was
back into the ground loop mode. It started an uncontrollable turn to the right and the
wing was dragging again. Suddenly there was a load crunch, and I was stopped. This time it
did not right itself. The left wheel has sustained such a side load that it neatly tucked
itself under and collapsed. It was back to the draw ing board without ever having been so
much as an inch off the ground!
With the landing gear all rebuilt, I was ready to continue. We
greatly limited the travel of the swiveling gear, and this seemed to tame the ground loop
part. Now we were working up to the high speed taxis, and I wanted to lift it off of the
ground. I would get the tail up and accelerate as fast as I thought it should need, (I had
no airspeed indicator) and carefully eased the control stick back. Nothing! All it did was
slow down. It had no indications that it wanted to fly at all.
Now what? Several attempts ended with the same results. I had a ground hog on my hands and
I did not know why.
It was at this time that I needed to consult the experts. I
placed a call to the Old Rhinebeck Aerodrome in upstate New York. I first talked to John
Barker, a walking encyclopedia of old aeroplane information who had been Cole Palen's
right hand man. He referred me to their "chief" Bleriot pilot Mr. Carl Ericson
who was able to brief me on some of the finer points in flying the Bleriot. First he said
that you needed to get the tail way up on take off, much higher than you feel you should.
Next when you think it is going as fast as it will you give the stick a pull and force it
into the air. The rest was elementary. Hang on for dear life and fly it back onto the
ground. Sure enough he was right. Never underestimate the value of experience!
Heeding Eric's advice I managed to coax the Bleriot into the air.
It really did not
want to be there, and at this point, neither did I! I made several runs up and down the
run- way sometimes getting up'to about 20 feet in altitude. It seemed so strange I would
come back thinking I had set some altitude record only to find that I was merely 10 to 15
feet high. One such run I was cruising along fat, dumb and happy (sheer terror) when
I noticed that the end of the runway was coming up, and I did not want to go around yet.
So I merely pulled back on the power and felt the bottom beginning to fall out from
beneath me. I was dropping so fast I was trying to break the decent with the elevator.
Next, the right wing began to drop so I tried to correct with left stick. Crash, I was on
the ground and I bet the airplane did not move ten feet from impact.
Not a good day at all. Close examination revealed
several broken wires in the fuselage, a smashed tailskid and collapsed landing gear
(again!).
After discussing the episode again with Eric I learned the
errors in my ways, The Bleriot wing design had been a direct attempt to emulate the shape
and function of a bird's wing minus the flapping. The airfoil, with its distinct
undercamber and hooked nose, is very reminiscent our feathered friends. Lateral control is
also based on the way a bird flies, and utilizes what is known as "wing warping
instead of ailerons. Somehow the birds seem to do just fine with all of this, but man is
just not exactly up to the task. First we find that the strange airfoil causes very high
drag. I needed to raise the tail as high as possible to flatten out the wing. With this
done the aircraft could accelerate just enough to overcome the drag. Wing warping, I had
already noticed, was at best not very effective. It would raise a wino, if you had time to
wait. I also noticed that I had the stick buried in the upper left-hand corner of the
cockpit while in flight. Now people ask why you do not notice these things when you are
flying? When you are flying something that is just barely holding on anyway, you tend to
move things wherever they seem to do you the most good. Often you have no idea where the
stick is relative to center while your mind is occupied with other things, What'. I did on
this last flight was first to reduce power on a high drag machine, which was barely flying
anyway. Next, as the wing began to drop, I corrected with the stick. What I did not
realize was that when I moved the stick to the left, it was in fact increasing the angle
of attack on the right wing. Angle of attack is the angle in which the wind hits the
airfoil. I was already next to a stall and now I increased the angle and completed the
stall on the right wing. Say good night, I was going down!
By now I was beginning to look at Frank's words a little
differently. Maybe there was something to this. I had been fulled by the Farman into
thinking that this old stuff was a piece of cake. The Bleriot is a whole different
ball game!
We rebuilt the wreck in time for the next flying lesson. I
continued to make a num- ber of runs down the runway. A few little rigging adjustments
brought the stick back to center in flight. I now had to move on to the next big hurdle. I
needed to take the ship around the field and really see what it was like in the air. I
finally got up the nerve to take it around. I cannot explain the thought process as you
make the decision that this will be it. You're up ... everything seems to be going well
... the machine is climbing ... so let's do it!
As soon as you make that first turn things begin to look a lot different I am now
committed. I can either go around or put down in the farmer's field. Full power seems just
a bit on the weak side; I keep pushing on the throttle just to make sure. Be careful on
the bank since this is your weakest control. Skid around the turn. It does not look grace
ful, but the wings stay where you want them. I make a full circuit of the field, and
things seem sort of under control, The engine is running fine. Rated RPM and good oil
temp. I think I will go around again. As I level off on the second downwind leg, I decide
that maybe I should check the power and see if it will fly on reduced power. I carefully
ease the throttle back just a bit and feel like I am hanging onto a sponge. Full power and
I am back where I was before approximately 200 feet which is much too high to fall and
much too low to recover. I think things are just fine at full power. As I skid around onto
my final approach I start a descent, still under power. I feel the wind in my face picking
up so now I reduce power just a bit, not too much. As I approach the ground, 1 only
slightly pull back on the stick just to break the descent, and suddenly I feel the wheels
rolling on the ground. Amazing! I pull the power and I gently come to a stop. I have to
remember to turn off the engine. My body finally starts to relax and I can feel my
sphincter muscles releasing their death grip on the seat.
And there I am a real Bleriot pilot!
Nothing to it! Since then I have made many other flights In the
Bleriot. To date all successful and without further damage. I have tried to think of the
proper way to explain my feelings while flying the Bleriot, and I guess the best way is to
say it is almost like being lifted off of the ground while flying a kite. You immediately
realize that you depend on both the kite and the string. If either decides to let you down
the results will be the same.
Now that you are undoubtedly questioning my sanity for even
flying such a crazy machine, I will tell you why I think it is important that that we keep
these old crates flying. I honestly believe that with careful attention these aircraft can
be safely flown within a controlled environment. I also believe that it is tremendously
important for future generations to have the opportunity of witnessing this primitive
technology in action so that they can t'nfly appreciate how far that technology has
brought us. |
|
|
|